pro life movement

Ep 34 – Top 10 Worst Pro-Life Arguments

Posted on Updated on

 

Hello friends! thanks for joining me and Nicole for this episode of the Fetal Position podcast! In episode 34, we discuss the top 10 absolute worst pro-life arguments/tactics. The relevant links are at the bottom, and for more details about each point… I guess you’re gonna have to listen to the show! 😉

10: “Women regret their abortion”

9: :Women can die (or be hurt) from a legal abortion”

8: “Abortion is wrong because it hurts the economy”

7: “Because the bible/God says (this depends on who your audience is)”

6: “You’re pro-choice on abortion but not schools, health care, gun ownership taxes, etc”

5: “I’m more pro-life than you because I am in favor of universal health care, etc”

4: Condemning women who have had abortions.
– Saying things like “that woman deserved to die during the abortion” or “i’m glad she killed herself after the abortion”

3: “What if your mother had aborted you?” or “You should have been aborted!”

2: “Progress towards protecting life from abortion is ‘compromising’”

1: “You might have just aborted the next Beethoven/Einstein/Washington

Here’s the link to DANK PRO-LIFE MEMES, and if you enjoyed this or thought it was absolutely terrible, let me know in the comments below, on the facebook page, private facebook group, twitter, or by email (FetalPositionPodcast@gmail.com). Thanks so much for reading/listening!

 

 

Students for Life Responds to Teen Vogue

Posted on

A couple of weeks ago, Teen Vogue put out an article (is a slideshow really an article? I dunno) titled “What to Get a Friend Post-Abortion” which lays out a handful of gift ideas to get your friend who has recently had an abortion. They suggest things like movies, some special underwear, poetry, needlepoint embroidery, coloring books, and chocolate. When I first saw it, I dismissed it as yet another article that simply assumes that abortion is a morally inconsequential surgical procedure, so I chocked it up to being not worth engaging.

Plus, the article is in Teen Vogue. They basically talk about nothing but celebrity gossip and fashion tips. And as an almost 30 year old man, I don’t think I could be less interested in that or further from their target audience. But their target audience has read it, and many of them don’t adhere to the default pro-choice perspective. Allow me to introduce you to Autumn, of Students for Life.
She’s a 16 year old girl, so Teen Vogue was essentially talking to her with this article. And Autumn recognizes it for what it is. As she says in the video, “The point of the article was to make the situation seem as light hearted and nonchalant as possible in order to convince girls my age that abortion is not big deal. We need to clarify one thing. Abortion is a big deal”

Here is Autumn:

I know this post might be considered “late” in the internet realm of immediate responding, but that’s ok. If you haven’t seen this video yet, now you have. And if you have seen it, watch it again and modify the way you respond to certain people based on how she’s responded to Teen Vogue. I tend to take a much more philosophical approach and remove any language of being offended for the sake of dealing with the academic issues. But this issue is far more than merely academic. It is a real, visceral problem in our society. People need to treat abortion like the thing that it is: The loss of an innocent, defenseless human life that has done nothing except exist, and is punished for existing.

It needs to end.
Students for Life is one branch of the end of abortion. “If you know someone who has had an abortion, don’t buy them a gag gift and disguise it as a celebration,” says Autumn. “Treat it for what it is. A terrible loss.”
This confirms that the millennial generation is The Pro Life Generation.

Here’s How Progressives Can Prove They’re Pro-Life Too

Posted on Updated on

I am the father of 2 handsome young boys, Micah and Cole. During a routine ultrasound, the technician was unable to locate a particular flap of skin in Cole’s developing heart. Because my wife and I weren’t sure what that meant, I had to ask. The technician said that she would need to have someone else take a look, but that there’s a possibility that our unborn son’s heart wasn’t developing according to schedule. She reassured us that it’s likely that she just can’t see it due to the angle, but even the thought that our son’s heart might not develop properly was enough to humble us immediately.

So we went back for a much more in-depth ultrasound a week or so later. We waited in the waiting room for what seemed like forever, hoping and praying that there wasn’t anything wrong with Cole’s heart. The ultrasound wasn’t considered “medically necessary”, so it was considerably more expensive than the first one, but we didn’t care. We just wanted to know that our son was ok, and if he wasn’t… well… we just wanted to know that our son was ok. The more advanced screening was much longer, and the technician pressed much harder on my wife’s belly in order to try and see the heart more clearly. He pushed Cole around a bit, and was having a visibly difficult time trying to locate the small line on the monitor.
The small line that would indicate whether or not our child would be born free of heart complications. A small shadow that might indicate a lifetime of expenses, doctor visits, medications, and time.

Cole celebrating Christmas with the youth group at church

He was finally able to locate what he was looking for. It was because of the angle (Cole was not very active during the day).
Our son is currently 7 months old with no heart defects. Happy, healthy, and pudgy. Just like how babies are supposed to be.

But the incident got me thinking. Imagine if he had a heart defect. I would have wanted the best possible medical care for my son, just like any parent. And I’m just a regular dude with a 9am to 5pm job. My wife is a lularoe consultant. We’re not millionaires. So, more than likely, we would have had to make sacrifices in order to get Cole’s medical care.

And for this reason, I completely reject the reasoning behind increased government regulation in the healthcare marketplace. Not only is the federal government overstepping its bounds by intruding in on the healthcare market, but the intervention into the market constantly drives up costs. The meaningless regulation, the constantly increasing bureaucratic nightmare of the insurance industry, the failure of the government-run healthcare marketplaces… it’s just chaos. I can’t believe that anyone who pretends to believe in the right to healthcare would want it to be so difficult to receive proper care. The goal of anyone who actually cares about the health of his friends and family should reject anything but a free market in healthcare. The only way to make sure that families like mine are able to receive the healthcare that they need is to get the government out of the way, and allow the market to decrease the cost while increasing the quality. We should have real choices in healthcare! Who wouldn’t want real choices, increased quality, and decreased cost?

Have you noticed that medical prices are constantly increasing, but the cost of super fast computers, TVs, and drones with HD cameras are becoming better and better while the prices keep shrinking and shrinking? The laws of economics don’t change just because we’re dealing with healthcare.

So please, progressives/liberals/democrats/socialists. I beg of you.
Examine the options and realize that all of this increased regulation, bureaucracy, and government intervention into the marketplace is hurting those who you think you’re trying to help. We need to repeal the ACA. We need a free market replacement. Don’t be obstructionists. Your socialized solution has not worked, and will not work. We shouldn’t have to be dependent on the [largely incompetent] government for something as important as the health of our families.

And this doesn’t just for health insurance.

  • Get the government out of our education system. I want a high quality education for my children. The government is getting in the way.
  • No more government regulations in our loans and banking systems. I want to be able to afford a good house in a good area and not have to worry about you manipulating the interest rates and taxing a significant portion of my hard-earned income paying a whole variety of taxes. I want my money to go to my family and my needs.
  • We need to encourage free trade with other countries. Why are so many people against high quality goods and services from other countries? Please allow me to purchase high quality goods for my children. Stop getting in the way.
  • When you advocate for an increase in the minimum wage, you’re advocating for an increase in cost for unskilled labor. This should be an agreement between the employer and employee. When you force an employer to pay unskilled workers more, the cost of goods and services increases. In order to alleviate the cost, the price of goods and services go up. Why don’t you want me to be able to afford things for my family?

And how can you call yourself pro-life when you supported the Obama administration dropping over 20,000 bombs in the middle east in 2016? How can you call yourself pro-life when you support a government-run prison system that puts people to death, and only about 25% of those on death row are actually guilty?

So I have to ask… if the progressive policymakers won’t consult a basic economics textbook in their proposals (resulting in a more difficult life for everyone), can we really call them pro-life?

 


Ps.
Dear progressives who assume (without arguing for it) that their political system is the most “pro-life”; isn’t it annoying when someone attaches extra stuff to the pro-life label? Isn’t it annoying when someone who disagrees with you on a non-abortion related issue calls you “not really pro-life” when you disagree on something other than abortion?
Great. Now you know how we feel when you do the same. Like here. And here. And so many other places.

Please subscribe to my pro-life (meaning anti-abortion because that’s the definition of pro-life) podcast, The Fetal Position 🙂

Ep 23 – New Wave Feminism with Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa

Posted on Updated on

Super excited to have Destiny (founder of the New Wave Feminists) on the show. In this episode, we chat about feminism (why women are superheroes, but that doesn’t mean men suck), what “new wave” feminism is, the NWF’s approach to the pro-life issue, and the women’s march on washington.

Thanks again to Destiny for coming on the show!

You can listen to the episode in a new window here, and you can find them on facebook here and at their website, NewWaveFeminists.com

Ep 18 – Could a Trump Presidency Hurt the Pro-Life Movement? Rich Poupard Interview

Posted on Updated on

FP_Logo1Hi everyone!
Click here to listen to the show in a new window
Thanks for joining me for this episode of the Fetal Position podcast. In this episode, I interview Rich Poupard about some recent thoughts he put on his facebook page (which I turned into a guest post here at the Fetal Position, click here for that).

I hope you enjoy the interview!
Please leave a comment or question, share and review the show! Thanks! 🙂