Here’s How Progressives Can Prove They’re Pro-Life Too

Posted on Updated on

I am the father of 2 handsome young boys, Micah and Cole. During a routine ultrasound, the technician was unable to locate a particular flap of skin in Cole’s developing heart. Because my wife and I weren’t sure what that meant, I had to ask. The technician said that she would need to have someone else take a look, but that there’s a possibility that our unborn son’s heart wasn’t developing according to schedule. She reassured us that it’s likely that she just can’t see it due to the angle, but even the thought that our son’s heart might not develop properly was enough to humble us immediately.

So we went back for a much more in-depth ultrasound a week or so later. We waited in the waiting room for what seemed like forever, hoping and praying that there wasn’t anything wrong with Cole’s heart. The ultrasound wasn’t considered “medically necessary”, so it was considerably more expensive than the first one, but we didn’t care. We just wanted to know that our son was ok, and if he wasn’t… well… we just wanted to know that our son was ok. The more advanced screening was much longer, and the technician pressed much harder on my wife’s belly in order to try and see the heart more clearly. He pushed Cole around a bit, and was having a visibly difficult time trying to locate the small line on the monitor.
The small line that would indicate whether or not our child would be born free of heart complications. A small shadow that might indicate a lifetime of expenses, doctor visits, medications, and time.

Cole celebrating Christmas with the youth group at church

He was finally able to locate what he was looking for. It was because of the angle (Cole was not very active during the day).
Our son is currently 7 months old with no heart defects. Happy, healthy, and pudgy. Just like how babies are supposed to be.

But the incident got me thinking. Imagine if he had a heart defect. I would have wanted the best possible medical care for my son, just like any parent. And I’m just a regular dude with a 9am to 5pm job. My wife is a lularoe consultant. We’re not millionaires. So, more than likely, we would have had to make sacrifices in order to get Cole’s medical care.

And for this reason, I completely reject the reasoning behind increased government regulation in the healthcare marketplace. Not only is the federal government overstepping its bounds by intruding in on the healthcare market, but the intervention into the market constantly drives up costs. The meaningless regulation, the constantly increasing bureaucratic nightmare of the insurance industry, the failure of the government-run healthcare marketplaces… it’s just chaos. I can’t believe that anyone who pretends to believe in the right to healthcare would want it to be so difficult to receive proper care. The goal of anyone who actually cares about the health of his friends and family should reject anything but a free market in healthcare. The only way to make sure that families like mine are able to receive the healthcare that they need is to get the government out of the way, and allow the market to decrease the cost while increasing the quality. We should have real choices in healthcare! Who wouldn’t want real choices, increased quality, and decreased cost?

Have you noticed that medical prices are constantly increasing, but the cost of super fast computers, TVs, and drones with HD cameras are becoming better and better while the prices keep shrinking and shrinking? The laws of economics don’t change just because we’re dealing with healthcare.

So please, progressives/liberals/democrats/socialists. I beg of you.
Examine the options and realize that all of this increased regulation, bureaucracy, and government intervention into the marketplace is hurting those who you think you’re trying to help. We need to repeal the ACA. We need a free market replacement. Don’t be obstructionists. Your socialized solution has not worked, and will not work. We shouldn’t have to be dependent on the [largely incompetent] government for something as important as the health of our families.

And this doesn’t just for health insurance.

  • Get the government out of our education system. I want a high quality education for my children. The government is getting in the way.
  • No more government regulations in our loans and banking systems. I want to be able to afford a good house in a good area and not have to worry about you manipulating the interest rates and taxing a significant portion of my hard-earned income paying a whole variety of taxes. I want my money to go to my family and my needs.
  • We need to encourage free trade with other countries. Why are so many people against high quality goods and services from other countries? Please allow me to purchase high quality goods for my children. Stop getting in the way.
  • When you advocate for an increase in the minimum wage, you’re advocating for an increase in cost for unskilled labor. This should be an agreement between the employer and employee. When you force an employer to pay unskilled workers more, the cost of goods and services increases. In order to alleviate the cost, the price of goods and services go up. Why don’t you want me to be able to afford things for my family?

And how can you call yourself pro-life when you supported the Obama administration dropping over 20,000 bombs in the middle east in 2016? How can you call yourself pro-life when you support a government-run prison system that puts people to death, and only about 25% of those on death row are actually guilty?

So I have to ask… if the progressive policymakers won’t consult a basic economics textbook in their proposals (resulting in a more difficult life for everyone), can we really call them pro-life?


Dear progressives who assume (without arguing for it) that their political system is the most “pro-life”; isn’t it annoying when someone attaches extra stuff to the pro-life label? Isn’t it annoying when someone who disagrees with you on a non-abortion related issue calls you “not really pro-life” when you disagree on something other than abortion?
Great. Now you know how we feel when you do the same. Like here. And here. And so many other places.

Please subscribe to my pro-life (meaning anti-abortion because that’s the definition of pro-life) podcast, The Fetal Position 🙂

3 thoughts on “Here’s How Progressives Can Prove They’re Pro-Life Too

    Tony Vance said:
    January 30, 2017 at 15:21

    Oh how I wish dreams/wishes came true!

    Yaohan Chen said:
    February 20, 2017 at 00:38

    There are plenty of good arguments for a free market, but healthcare is not an area where it benefits the public. We had a more free market before ACA. Insurance companies charged women more, denied applicants with pre-existing conditions, and insurance rates rose. ACA did not solve the last problem but solved the first two. It also greatly increased coverage..

    Manufactured goods like computers have become cheaper and cheaper, but services like haircuts and restaurant meals have become more and more expensive. Healthcare belongs more in the latter category. In any case, the only way to lower insurance costs is for more people to pay into it. responded:
      February 20, 2017 at 06:43

      Crony capitalism is not a better option, and that’s what we had before ACA and it’s what we still have.

      Why did insurance companies “charge women more”? Could it be that insurance coverage for pregnancy and childbirth (something men shouldn’t have to pay for cuz we don’t birth children) are added costs?

      When someone is given money for a pre-existing condition, that is not insurance. It is a subsidy. It is perfectly reasonable for an insurance company to deny someone with a pre-existing condition because they’re an insurance company, not a subsidy company.

      When you force men to pay for costs they will never have to use (women’s care) and when you force insurance companies to be subsidy companies, prices go up.

      You may think the ACA did a good with those two things, but you’d be wrong.

      Services increase in cost at least partially because of inflation, which is caused by the federal reserve. So let’s abolish the fed while we’re at it too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *